End of decade corrections

Once new decennial Census populations are available, the Census Bureau typically produces two new annual bridged race population estimates: the new intercensal population estimates incorporating both the new Census and the previous Census to replace the existing time series of postcensal populations based solely on projections from the previous Census; postcensal population estimates projected forward based on the new Census beginning with the new Census year. By incorporating data from two censuses, intercensal population estimates smooth the transition from one census to the next.

In respect of the new 2020 Census, the 2010-2019 intercensal population estimates are not produced by the Census Bureau, but by Woods & Poole Economics, Inc. through a contract with the NCI. The methodology used follows previously published Census methodologies to align closely with the anticipated Census Bureau’s intercensal data that are tentatively scheduled to be released late 2024 and to prepare for a smooth transition to use Census Bureau’s intercensal in NCI’s next release. This process used by Census Bureau for producing the intercensal population from the previous decade (i.e., 2000-2009) is described in the Methodology for the intercensal population and housing unit estimates.

SEER statistics use intercensal population estimates for 2010 to 2019 and Vintage 2022 estimates for 2020 forward.

Graphs comparing new population estimates to previous estimates

To summarize the differences between the new estimates and the previous estimates, we have generated a set of time-series graphs for each of the 50 states, the District of Columbia, the SEER registry areas, and the SEER registry groupings. The graphs are shown by age and by race/ethnicity.

The graphs show trends in the population estimates over time. There are three estimates shown:

  1. Population estimates from Vintage 2020 (Last year of forward projections using Census 2010)
  2. Intercensal population estimates (Revised estimated populations going back in time using both Census 2010 and Census 2020)
  3. Population estimates from Vintage 2022 (Forward projections using Census 2020)

In general, the new intercensal population estimates are very close to the previous estimates, although this varies by state. Since estimating net migration between censuses is difficult, there tends to be more of a difference in the estimates for the more mobile younger populations.

  • Total United States

    Populations by Age

    Total US Population Graph (by Age)

    For the United States, the new estimates for all age groups, age 0-14, 15-39, 40-64, and 65+, are about the same as the previous estimates.

  • Alabama

    Populations by Age

    Alabama Population Graph (by Age)

    For Alabama, the new estimates for ages 0-14 and 65+ are about the same as the previous estimates. The new estimates for ages 15-39, 40-64 are higher than the previous estimates.

  • Alaska

    Populations by Age

    Alaska Population Graph (by Age)

    For the Alaska, the new estimates for all age groups, age 0-14, 15-39, 40-64, and 65+, are about the same as the previous estimates.

  • Arizona

    Populations by Age

    Arizona Population Graph (by Age)

    For Arizona, the new estimates for all age groups, age 0-14, 15-39, 40-64, and 65+, are lower than the previous estimates.

  • Arkansas

    Populations by Age

    Arkansas Population Graph (by Age)

    For the Arkansas, the new estimates for all age groups, age 0-14, 15-39, 40-64, and 65+, are about the same as the previous estimates.

  • California

    Populations by Age

    California Population Graph (by Age)

    For the California, the new estimates for all age groups, age 0-14, 15-39, 40-64, and 65+, are about the same as the previous estimates.

  • Greater California SEER Area

    Populations by Age

    California Population Graph (by Age)

    For the greater California SEER area, the new estimates for all age groups, age 0-14, 15-39, 40-64, and 65+, are about the same as the previous estimates.

  • Los Angeles SEER Area

    Populations by Age

    Los Angeles SEER Area Population Graph (by Age)

    For the Los Angeles SEER area, the new estimates for all age groups, age 0-14, 15-39, 40-64, and 65+, are about the same as the previous estimates.

  • San Francisco-Oakland SMSA SEER Area

    Populations by Age

    San Francisco-Oakland SEER Area Population Graph (by Age)

    For the San Francisco-Oakland SEER area, the new estimates for all age groups, age 0-14, 15-39, 40-64, and 65+, are about the same as the previous estimates.

  • San Jose-Monterey SEER Area

    Populations by Age

    San Jose-Monterey SEER Area Population Graph (by Age)

    For the San Jose-Monterey SEER area, the new estimates for all age groups, age 0-14, 15-39, 40-64, and 65+, are about the same as the previous estimates.

  • Colorado

    Populations by Age

    Colorado Population Graph (by Age)

    For Colorado, the new estimates for all age groups, age 0-14, 15-39, 40-64, and 65+, are about the same as the previous estimates.

  • Connecticut

    Populations by Age

    Connecticut Population Graph (by Age)

    For Connecticut, the new estimates for all age groups, age 0-14, 15-39, 40-64, and 65+, are about the same as the previous estimates.

  • Delaware

    Populations by Age

    Delaware Population Graph (by Age)

    For Delaware, the new estimates for all age groups, age 0-14, 15-39, 40-64, and 65+, are about the same as the previous estimates.

  • District of Columbia (Washington, D.C.)

    Populations by Age

    District of Columbia Population Graph (by Age)

    For District of Columbia, the new estimates for ages 0-14, 40-64, and 65+, are about the same as the previous estimates. The estimates for ages 15-39 are lower than previous estimates.

  • Florida

    Populations by Age

    Florida Population Graph (by Age)

    For Florida, the new estimates for all age groups, age 0-14, 15-39, 40-64, and 65+, are about the same as the previous estimates.

  • Georgia

    Populations by Age

    Georgia Population Graph (by Age)

    For Georgia, the new estimates for all age groups, age 0-14, 15-39, 40-64, and 65+, are about the same as the previous estimates.

  • Atlanta (Metropolitan) SEER Area

    Populations by Age

    Atlanta SEER Area Population Graph (by Age)

    For Atlanta (Metropolitan) SEER area, the new estimates for all age groups, age 0-14, 15-39, 40-64, and 65+, are about the same as the previous estimates.

  • Greater Georgia SEER Area

    Populations by Age

    Atlanta SEER Area Population Graph (by Age)

    For greater Georgia SEER area, the new estimates for all age groups, age 0-14, 15-39, 40-64, and 65+, are about the same as the previous estimates.

  • Rural Georgia SEER Area

    Populations by Age

    Rural Georgia SEER Area Population Graph (by Age)

    For rural Georgia SEER area, the new estimates for all age groups, age 0-14, 15-39, 40-64, and 65+, are about the same as the previous estimates.

  • Hawaii

    Populations by Age

    Hawaii Population Graph (by Age)

    For Hawaii, the new estimates for ages 0-14 and 65+, are about the same as the previous estimates. The estimates for ages 15-39 and 40-64 are higher than the previous estimates.

  • Idaho

    Populations by Age

    Idaho Population Graph (by Age)

    For Idaho, the new estimates for ages 0-14, 40-64 and 65+, are about the same as the previous estimates. The estimates for ages 15-39 are higher than the previous estimates.

  • Illinois

    Populations by Age

    Illinois Population Graph (by Age)

    For Illinois, the new estimates for ages 0-14 and 65+, are about the same as the previous estimates. The estimates for ages 15-39 and 40-64 are higher than the previous estimates.

  • Indiana

    Populations by Age

    Indiana Population Graph (by Age)

    For Indiana, the new estimates for all age groups, age 0-14, 15-39, 40-64, and 65+, are about the same as the previous estimates.

  • Iowa

    Populations by Age

    Iowa Population Graph (by Age)

    For Iowa, the new estimates for all age groups, age 0-14, 15-39, 40-64, and 65+, are about the same as the previous estimates.

  • Kansas

    Populations by Age

    Kansas Population Graph (by Age)

    For Kansas, the new estimates for all age groups, age 0-14, 15-39, 40-64, and 65+, are about the same as the previous estimates.

  • Kentucky

    Populations by Age

    Kentucky Population Graph (by Age)

    For Kentucky, the new estimates for all age groups, age 0-14, 15-39, 40-64, and 65+, are about the same as the previous estimates.

  • Louisiana

    Populations by Age

    Louisiana Population Graph (by Age)

    For Louisiana, the new estimates for all age groups, age 0-14, 15-39, 40-64, and 65+, are about the same as the previous estimates.

  • Maine

    Populations by Age

    Maine Population Graph (by Age)

    For Maine, the new estimates for all age groups, age 0-14, 15-39, 40-64, and 65+, are about the same as the previous estimates.

  • Maryland

    Populations by Age

    Maryland Population Graph (by Age)

    For Maryland, the new estimates for ages 0-14 and 65+, are about the same as the previous estimates. The estimates for ages 15-39 and 40-64 are higher than the previous estimates.

  • Massachusetts

    Populations by Age

    Massachusetts Population Graph (by Age)

    For Massachusetts, the new estimates for ages 0-14 and 65+, are about the same as the previous estimates. The estimates for ages 15-39 and 40-64 are higher than the previous estimates.

  • Michigan

    Populations by Age

    Michigan Population Graph (by Age)

    For Michigan, the new estimates for all age groups, age 0-14, 15-39, 40-64, and 65+, are about the same as the previous estimates.

  • Minnesota

    Populations by Age

    Minnesota Population Graph (by Age)

    For Minnesota, the new estimates for all age groups, age 0-14, 15-39, 40-64, and 65+, are about the same as the previous estimates.

  • Mississippi

    Populations by Age

    Mississippi Population Graph (by Age)

    For Mississippi, the new estimates for all age groups, age 0-14, 15-39, 40-64, and 65+, are about the same as the previous estimates.

  • Missouri

    Populations by Age

    Missouri Population Graph (by Age)

    For Missouri, the new estimates for all age groups, age 0-14, 15-39, 40-64, and 65+, are about the same as the previous estimates.

  • Montana

    Populations by Age

    Montana Population Graph (by Age)

    For Montana, the new estimates for all age groups, age 0-14, 15-39, 40-64, and 65+, are about the same as the previous estimates.

  • Nebraska

    Populations by Age

    Nebraska Population Graph (by Age)

    For Nebraska, the new estimates for ages 0-14 and 65+, are about the same as the previous estimates. The estimates for ages 15-39 and 40-64 are higher than the previous estimates.

  • Nevada

    Populations by Age

    Nevada Population Graph (by Age)

    For Nevada, the new estimates for all age groups, age 0-14, 15-39, 40-64, and 65+, are about the same as the previous estimates.

  • New Hampshire

    Populations by Age

    New Hampshire Population Graph (by Age)

    For New Hampshire, the new estimates for all age groups, age 0-14, 15-39, 40-64, and 65+, are about the same as the previous estimates.

  • New Jersey

    Populations by Age

    New Jersey Population Graph (by Age)

    For New Jersey, the new estimates for ages 0-14 and 65+, are about the same as the previous estimates. The estimates for ages 15-39 and 40-64 are higher than the previous estimates.

  • New Mexico

    Populations by Age

    New Mexico Population Graph (by Age)

    For New Mexico, the new estimates for all age groups, age 0-14, 15-39, 40-64, and 65+, are about the same as the previous estimates.

  • New York

    Populations by Age

    New York Population Graph (by Age)

    For New York, the new estimates for ages 0-14 and 65+, are about the same as the previous estimates. The estimates for ages 15-39 and 40-64 are higher than the previous estimates.

  • North Carolina

    Populations by Age

    North Carolina Population Graph (by Age)

    For North Carolina, the new estimates for all age groups, age 0-14, 15-39, 40-64, and 65+, are about the same as the previous estimates.

  • North Dakota

    Populations by Age

    North Dakota Population Graph (by Age)

    For North Dakota, the new estimates for all age groups, age 0-14, 15-39, 40-64, and 65+, are about the same as the previous estimates.

  • Ohio

    Populations by Age

    Ohio Population Graph (by Age)

    For Ohio, the new estimates for all age groups, age 0-14, 15-39, 40-64, and 65+, are about the same as the previous estimates.

  • Oklahoma

    Populations by Age

    Oklahoma Population Graph (by Age)

    For Oklahoma, the new estimates for all age groups, age 0-14, 15-39, 40-64, and 65+, are about the same as the previous estimates.

  • Oregon

    Populations by Age

    Oregon Population Graph (by Age)

    For Oregon, the new estimates for all age groups, age 0-14, 15-39, 40-64, and 65+, are about the same as the previous estimates.

  • Pennsylvania

    Populations by Age

    Pennsylvania Population Graph (by Age)

    For Pennsylvania, the new estimates for ages 0-14 and 65+, are about the same as the previous estimates. The estimates for ages 15-39 and 40-64 are higher than the previous estimates.

  • Rhode Island

    Populations by Age

    Rhode Island Population Graph (by Age)

    For Rhode Island, the new estimates for ages 0-14 and 65+, are about the same as the previous estimates. The estimates for ages 15-39 and 40-64 are higher than the previous estimates.

  • SEER 8 Registries

    Populations by Age

    SEER 8 Area Population Graph (by Age)

    For the SEER 8 registries, the new estimates for all age groups, age 0-14, 15-39, 40-64, and 65+, are about the same as the previous estimates.

  • SEER 17 Registries

    Populations by Age

    SEER 17 Area Population Graph (by Age)

    For the SEER 17 registries, the new estimates for all age groups, age 0-14, 15-39, 40-64, and 65+, are about the same as the previous estimates.

  • SEER 22 Registries

    Populations by Age

    SEER 22 Area Population Graph (by Age)

    For the SEER 22 registries, the new estimates for all age groups, age 0-14, 15-39, 40-64, and 65+, are about the same as the previous estimates.

  • South Carolina

    Populations by Age

    South Carolina Population Graph (by Age)

    For South Carolina, the new estimates for all ages, age 0-14, 15-39, 40-64 and 65+, are lower than the previous estimates.

  • South Dakota

    Populations by Age

    South Dakota Population Graph (by Age)

    For South Dakota, the new estimates for all age groups, age 0-14, 15-39, 40-64, and 65+, are about the same as the previous estimates.

  • Tennessee

    Populations by Age

    Tennessee Population Graph (by Age)

    For Tennessee, the new estimates for all age groups, age 0-14, 15-39, 40-64, and 65+, are about the same as the previous estimates.

  • Texas

    Populations by Age

    Texas Population Graph (by Age)

    For Texas, the new estimates for all age groups, age 0-14, 15-39, 40-64, and 65+, are about the same as the previous estimates.

  • Utah

    Populations by Age

    Utah Population Graph (by Age)

    For Utah, the new estimates for all age groups, age 0-14, 15-39, 40-64, and 65+, are about the same as the previous estimates.

  • Vermont

    Populations by Age

    Vermont Population Graph (by Age)

    For Vermont, the new estimates for ages 0-14 and 65+, are about the same as the previous estimates. The estimates for ages 15-39 and 40-64 are higher than the previous estimates.

  • Virginia

    Populations by Age

    Viginia Population Graph (by Age)

    For Virginia, the new estimates for all age groups, age 0-14, 15-39, 40-64, and 65+, are about the same as the previous estimates.

  • Washington

    Populations by Age

    Washington Population Graph (by Age)

    For Washington, the new estimates for all age groups, age 0-14, 15-39, 40-64, and 65+, are about the same as the previous estimates.

  • Seattle (Puget Sound) SEER Area

    Populations by Age

    Seattle (Puget Sound) SEER Area Population Graph (by Age)

    For the Seattle (Puget Sound) SEER area, the new estimates for all age groups, age 0-14, 15-39, 40-64, and 65+, are about the same as the previous estimates.

  • West Virginia

    Populations by Age

    West Virginia Population Graph (by Age)

    For West Virginia, the new estimates for all age groups, age 0-14, 15-39, 40-64, and 65+, are about the same as the previous estimates.

  • Wisconsin

    Populations by Age

    Wisconsin Population Graph (by Age)

    For Wisconsin, the new estimates for ages 0-14 and 65+, are about the same as the previous estimates. The estimates for ages 15-39 and 40-64 are higher than the previous estimates.

  • Wyoming

    Populations by Age

    Wyoming Population Graph (by Age)

    For Wyoming, the new estimates for all age groups, age 0-14, 15-39, 40-64, and 65+, are about the same as the previous estimates.

  • Total United States

    Populations by Race/Ethnicity

    Total United States Population Graph (by Race/Ethnicity)

    For the United States, the new estimates for non-Hispanic Whites are higher than the previous estimates. New estimates for Hispanic, non-Hispanic Black, Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander, non-Hispanic American Indian/Alaska Native are about the same as the previous estimates.

  • Alabama

    Populations by Race/Ethnicity

    Alabama Population Graph (by Race/Ethnicity)

    For Alabama the new estimates for all race/ethnicity groups, non-Hispanic White, Hispanic, non-Hispanic Black, Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander, and non-Hispanic American Indian/Alaska Native, are about the same as the previous estimates.

  • Alaska

    Populations by Race/Ethnicity

    Alaska Population Graph (by Race/Ethnicity)

    For Alaska the new estimates for all race/ethnicity groups, non-Hispanic White, Hispanic, non-Hispanic Black, Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander, and non-Hispanic American Indian/Alaska Native, are about the same as the previous estimates.

  • Arizona

    Populations by Race/Ethnicity

    Arizona Population Graph (by Race/Ethnicity)

    For Arizona the new estimates for all race/ethnicity groups, non-Hispanic White, Hispanic, non-Hispanic Black, Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander, and non-Hispanic American Indian/Alaska Native, are slightly lower than the previous estimates.

  • Arkansas

    Populations by Race/Ethnicity

    Arkansas Population Graph (by Race/Ethnicity)

    For Arkansas the new estimates for all race/ethnicity groups, non-Hispanic White, Hispanic, non-Hispanic Black, Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander, and non-Hispanic American Indian/Alaska Native, are about the same as the previous estimates.

  • California

    Populations by Race/Ethnicity

    California Population Graph (by Race/Ethnicity)

    For California the new estimates for all race/ethnicity groups, non-Hispanic White, Hispanic, non-Hispanic Black, Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander, and non-Hispanic American Indian/Alaska Native, are about the same as the previous estimates.

  • Greater California SEER Area

    Populations by Race/Ethnicity

    Greater California SEER Area Population Graph (by Race/Ethnicity)

    For the greater California SEER area the new estimates for all race/ethnicity groups, non-Hispanic White, Hispanic, non-Hispanic Black, Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander, and non-Hispanic American Indian/Alaska Native, are about the same as the previous estimates.

  • San Francisco-Oakland SMSA SEER Area

    Populations by Race/Ethnicity

    San Francisco-Oakland SMSA SEER Area Population Graph (by Race/Ethnicity)

    For the San Fransisco-Oakland SEER area the new estimates for all race/ethnicity groups, non-Hispanic White, Hispanic, non-Hispanic Black, Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander, and non-Hispanic American Indian/Alaska Native, are about the same as the previous estimates.

  • San Jose-Monterey SEER Area

    Populations by Race/Ethnicity

    San Jose-Monterey SEER Area Population Graph (by Race/Ethnicity)

    For the San Jose-Monterey SEER area the new estimates for all race/ethnicity groups, non-Hispanic White, Hispanic, non-Hispanic Black, Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander, and non-Hispanic American Indian/Alaska Native, are about the same as the previous estimates.

  • Los Angeles SEER Area

    Populations by Race/Ethnicity

    Los Angeles SEER Area Population Graph (by Race/Ethnicity)

    For the Los Angeles SEER area the new estimates for all race/ethnicity groups, non-Hispanic White, Hispanic, non-Hispanic Black, Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander, and non-Hispanic American Indian/Alaska Native, are about the same as the previous estimates.

  • Colorado

    Populations by Race/Ethnicity

    Colorado Population Graph (by Race/Ethnicity)

    For Colorado, the new estimates for all race/ethnicity groups, non-Hispanic White, Hispanic, non-Hispanic Black, Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander, and non-Hispanic American Indian/Alaska Native, are about the same as the previous estimates.

  • Connecticut

    Populations by Race/Ethnicity

    Connecticut Population Graph (by Race/Ethnicity)

    For Connecticut, the new estimates for all race/ethnicity groups, non-Hispanic White, Hispanic, non-Hispanic Black, Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander, and non-Hispanic American Indian/Alaska Native, are about the same as the previous estimates.

  • Delaware

    Populations by Race/Ethnicity

    Delaware Population Graph (by Race/Ethnicity)

    For Delaware, the new estimates for all race/ethnicity groups, non-Hispanic White, Hispanic, non-Hispanic Black, Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander, and non-Hispanic American Indian/Alaska Native, are about the same as the previous estimates.

  • District of Columbia (Washington, D.C.)

    Populations by Race/Ethnicity

    District of Columbia (Washington, DC) Population Graph (by Race/Ethnicity)

    For District of Columbia, the new estimates for non-Hispanic Whites and non-Hispanic Blacks are lower than the previous estimates. The new estimates for Hispanic, Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander, and non-Hispanic American Indian/Alaska Natives are about the same as the previous estimates.

  • Florida

    Populations by Race/Ethnicity

    Florida Population Graph (by Race/Ethnicity)

    For Florida, the new estimates for all race/ethnicity groups, non-Hispanic White, Hispanic, non-Hispanic Black, Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander, and non-Hispanic American Indian/Alaska Native, are about the same as the previous estimates.

  • Georgia

    Populations by Race/Ethnicity

    Georgia Population Graph (by Race/Ethnicity)

    For Georgia, the new estimates for all race/ethnicity groups, non-Hispanic White, Hispanic, non-Hispanic Black, Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander, and non-Hispanic American Indian/Alaska Native, are about the same as the previous estimates.

  • Atlanta (Metropolitan) SEER Area

    Populations by Race/Ethnicity

    Atlanta SEER Area Population Graph (by Race/Ethnicity)

    For the Atlanta (Metropolitan) SEER area, the new estimates for all race/ethnicity groups, non-Hispanic White, Hispanic, non-Hispanic Black, Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander, and non-Hispanic American Indian/Alaska Native, are about the same as the previous estimates.

  • Greater Georgia SEER Area

    Populations by Race/Ethnicity

    Greater Georgia SEER Area Population Graph (by Race/Ethnicity)

    For the greater Georgia SEER area, the new estimates for all race/ethnicity groups, non-Hispanic White, Hispanic, non-Hispanic Black, Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander, and non-Hispanic American Indian/Alaska Native, are about the same as the previous estimates.

  • Rural Georgia SEER Area

    Populations by Race/Ethnicity

    Rural Georgia SEER Area Population Graph (by Race/Ethnicity)

    For the rural Georgia SEER area, the new estimates for all race/ethnicity groups, non-Hispanic White, Hispanic, non-Hispanic Black, Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander, and non-Hispanic American Indian/Alaska Native, are about the same as the previous estimates.

  • Hawaii

    Populations by Race/Ethnicity

    Hawaii Population Graph (by Race/Ethnicity)

    For Hawaii, the new estimates for non-Hispanic Whites and non-Hispanic Blacks are higher than the previous estimates. The new estimates for Hispanic, Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander, and non-Hispanic American Indian/Alaska Natives are about the same as the previous estimates.

  • Idaho

    Populations by Race/Ethnicity

    Idaho Population Graph (by Race/Ethnicity)

    For Idaho, the new estimates for all race/ethnicity groups, non-Hispanic White, Hispanic, non-Hispanic Black, Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander, and non-Hispanic American Indian/Alaska Native, are about the same as the previous estimates.

  • Illinois

    Populations by Race/Ethnicity

    Illinois Population Graph (by Race/Ethnicity)

    For Illinois, the new estimates for all race/ethnicity groups, non-Hispanic White, Hispanic, non-Hispanic Black, Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander, and non-Hispanic American Indian/Alaska Native, are about the same as the previous estimates.

  • Indiana

    Populations by Race/Ethnicity

    Indiana Population Graph (by Race/Ethnicity)

    For Indiana, the new estimates for all race/ethnicity groups, non-Hispanic White, Hispanic, non-Hispanic Black, Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander, and non-Hispanic American Indian/Alaska Native, are about the same as the previous estimates.

  • Iowa

    Populations by Race/Ethnicity

    Iowa Population Graph (by Race/Ethnicity)

    For Iowa, the new estimates for all race/ethnicity groups, non-Hispanic White, Hispanic, non-Hispanic Black, Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander, and non-Hispanic American Indian/Alaska Native, are about the same as the previous estimates.

  • Kansas

    Populations by Race/Ethnicity

    Kansas Population Graph (by Race/Ethnicity)

    For Kansas, the new estimates for all race/ethnicity groups, non-Hispanic White, Hispanic, non-Hispanic Black, Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander, and non-Hispanic American Indian/Alaska Native, are about the same as the previous estimates.

  • Kentucky

    Populations by Race/Ethnicity

    Kentucky Population Graph (by Race/Ethnicity)

    For Kentucky, the new estimates for all race/ethnicity groups, non-Hispanic White, Hispanic, non-Hispanic Black, Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander, and non-Hispanic American Indian/Alaska Native, are about the same as the previous estimates.

  • Louisiana

    Populations by Race/Ethnicity

    Louisiana Population Graph (by Race/Ethnicity)

    For Louisiana, the new estimates for all race/ethnicity groups, non-Hispanic White, Hispanic, non-Hispanic Black, Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander, and non-Hispanic American Indian/Alaska Native, are about the same as the previous estimates.

  • Maine

    Populations by Race/Ethnicity

    Maine Population Graph (by Race/Ethnicity)

    For Maine, the new estimates for all race/ethnicity groups, non-Hispanic White, Hispanic, non-Hispanic Black, Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander, and non-Hispanic American Indian/Alaska Native, are about the same as the previous estimates.

  • Maryland

    Populations by Race/Ethnicity

    Maryland Population Graph (by Race/Ethnicity)

    For Maryland, the new estimates for all race/ethnicity groups, non-Hispanic White, Hispanic, non-Hispanic Black, Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander, and non-Hispanic American Indian/Alaska Native, are about the same as the previous estimates.

  • Massachusetts

    Populations by Race/Ethnicity

    Massachusetts Population Graph (by Race/Ethnicity)

    For Massachusetts, the new estimates for non-Hispanic Whites are higher than the previous estimates. The new estimates for non-Hispanic Blacks, Hispanic, Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander, and non-Hispanic American Indian/Alaska Natives are about the same as the previous estimates.

  • Michigan

    Populations by Race/Ethnicity

    Michigan Population Graph (by Race/Ethnicity)

    For Michigan, the new estimates for non-Hispanic Whites and non-Hispanic Blacks are higher than the previous estimates. The new estimates for Hispanic, Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander, and non-Hispanic American Indian/Alaska Natives are about the same as the previous estimates.

  • Minnesota

    Populations by Race/Ethnicity

    Minnesota Population Graph (by Race/Ethnicity)

    For Minnesota, the new estimates for non-Hispanic Whites are higher than the previous estimates. The new estimates for non-Hispanic Blacks, Hispanic, Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander, and non-Hispanic American Indian/Alaska Natives are about the same as the previous estimates.

  • Mississippi

    Populations by Race/Ethnicity

    Mississippi Population Graph (by Race/Ethnicity)

    For Mississippi, the new estimates for all race/ethnicity groups, non-Hispanic White, Hispanic, non-Hispanic Black, Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander, and non-Hispanic American Indian/Alaska Native, are about the same as the previous estimates.

  • Missouri

    Populations by Race/Ethnicity

    Missouri Population Graph (by Race/Ethnicity)

    For Missouri, the new estimates for non-Hispanic Whites are slightly lower than the previous estimates. The new estimates for non-Hispanic Blacks, Hispanic, Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander, and non-Hispanic American Indian/Alaska Natives are about the same as the previous estimates.

  • Montana

    Populations by Race/Ethnicity

    Montana Population Graph (by Race/Ethnicity)

    For Montana, the new estimates for all race/ethnicity groups, non-Hispanic White, Hispanic, non-Hispanic Black, Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander, and non-Hispanic American Indian/Alaska Native, are about the same as the previous estimates.

  • Nebraska

    Populations by Race/Ethnicity

    Nebraska Population Graph (by Race/Ethnicity)

    For Nebraska, the new estimates for non-Hispanic Whites are slightly higher than the previous estimates. The new estimates for non-Hispanic Blacks, Hispanic, Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander, and non-Hispanic American Indian/Alaska Natives are about the same as the previous estimates.

  • Nevada

    Populations by Race/Ethnicity

    Nevada Population Graph (by Race/Ethnicity)

    For Nevada, the new estimates for all race/ethnicity groups, non-Hispanic White, Hispanic, non-Hispanic Black, Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander, and non-Hispanic American Indian/Alaska Native, are about the same as the previous estimates.

  • New Hampshire

    Populations by Race/Ethnicity

    New Hampshire Population Graph (by Race/Ethnicity)

    For New Hampshire, the new estimates for non-Hispanic Whites are higher than the previous estimates. The new estimates for non-Hispanic Blacks, Hispanic, Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander, and non-Hispanic American Indian/Alaska Natives are about the same as the previous estimates.

  • New Jersey

    Populations by Race/Ethnicity

    New Jersey Population Graph (by Race/Ethnicity)

    For New Jersey, the new estimates for all race/ethnicity groups, non-Hispanic White, Hispanic, non-Hispanic Black, Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander, and non-Hispanic American Indian/Alaska Native, are about the same as the previous estimates.

  • New Mexico

    Populations by Race/Ethnicity

    New Mexico Population Graph (by Race/Ethnicity)

    For New Mexico, the new estimates for all race/ethnicity groups, non-Hispanic White, Hispanic, non-Hispanic Black, Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander, and non-Hispanic American Indian/Alaska Native, are about the same as the previous estimates.

  • New York

    Populations by Race/Ethnicity

    New York Population Graph (by Race/Ethnicity)

    For New York, the new estimates for all race/ethnicity groups, non-Hispanic White, Hispanic, non-Hispanic Black, Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander, and non-Hispanic American Indian/Alaska Native, are about the same as the previous estimates.

  • North Carolina

    Populations by Race/Ethnicity

    North Carolina Population Graph (by Race/Ethnicity)

    For North Carolina, the new estimates for all race/ethnicity groups, non-Hispanic White, Hispanic, non-Hispanic Black, Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander, and non-Hispanic American Indian/Alaska Native, are about the same as the previous estimates.

  • North Dakota

    Populations by Race/Ethnicity

    North Dakota Population Graph (by Race/Ethnicity)

    For North Dakota, the new estimates for non-Hispanic White, Hispanic, non-Hispanic Black, Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander are about the same as the previous estimates. The new estimates for non-Hispanic American Indian/Alaska Native are lower than the previous estimates.

  • Ohio

    Populations by Race/Ethnicity

    Ohio Population Graph (by Race/Ethnicity)

    For Ohio, the new estimates for non-Hispanic Whites are higher than the previous estimates. The new estimates for non-Hispanic Blacks, Hispanic, Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander, and non-Hispanic American Indian/Alaska Natives are about the same as the previous estimates.

  • Oklahoma

    Populations by Race/Ethnicity

    Oklahoma Population Graph (by Race/Ethnicity)

    For Oklahoma, the new estimates for all race/ethnicity groups, non-Hispanic White, Hispanic, non-Hispanic Black, Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander, and non-Hispanic American Indian/Alaska Native, are about the same as the previous estimates.

  • Oregon

    Populations by Race/Ethnicity

    Oregon Population Graph (by Race/Ethnicity)

    For Oregon, the new estimates for all race/ethnicity groups, non-Hispanic White, Hispanic, non-Hispanic Black, Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander, and non-Hispanic American Indian/Alaska Native, are about the same as the previous estimates.

  • Pennsylvania

    Populations by Race/Ethnicity

    Pennsylvania Population Graph (by Race/Ethnicity)

    For Pennsylvania, the new estimates for all race/ethnicity groups, non-Hispanic White, Hispanic, non-Hispanic Black, Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander, and non-Hispanic American Indian/Alaska Native, are about the same as the previous estimates.

  • Rhode Island

    Populations by Race/Ethnicity

    Rhode Island Population Graph (by Race/Ethnicity)

    For Rhode Island, the new estimates for non-Hispanic Whites and non-Hispanic Black are higher than previous estimates. New estimates for Hispanic, Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander, and non-Hispanic American Indian/Alaska Natives are about the same as the previous estimates.

  • SEER 8 Registries

    Populations by Race/Ethnicity

    SEER 8 Area Population Graph (by Race/Ethnicity)

    For SEER 8 registries, the new estimates for all race/ethnicity groups, non-Hispanic White, Hispanic, non-Hispanic Black, Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander, and non-Hispanic American Indian/Alaska Native, are about the same as the previous estimates.

  • SEER 17 Registries

    Populations by Race/Ethnicity

    SEER 17 Area Population Graph (by Race/Ethnicity)

    For SEER 17 registries, the new estimates for all race/ethnicity groups, non-Hispanic White, Hispanic, non-Hispanic Black, Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander, and non-Hispanic American Indian/Alaska Native, are about the same as the previous estimates.

  • SEER 22 Registries

    Populations by Race/Ethnicity

    SEER 22 Area Population Graph (by Race/Ethnicity)

    For SEER 22 registries, the new estimates for all race/ethnicity groups, non-Hispanic White, Hispanic, non-Hispanic Black, Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander, and non-Hispanic American Indian/Alaska Native, are about the same as the previous estimates.

  • South Carolina

    Populations by Race/Ethnicity

    South Carolina Population Graph (by Race/Ethnicity)

    For South Carolina, the new estimates for all race/ethnicity groups, non-Hispanic White, Hispanic, non-Hispanic Black, Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander, and non-Hispanic American Indian/Alaska Native, are about the same as the previous estimates.

  • South Dakota

    Populations by Race/Ethnicity

    South Dakota Population Graph (by Race/Ethnicity)

    For South Dakota, the new estimates for all race/ethnicity groups, non-Hispanic White, Hispanic, non-Hispanic Black, Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander, and non-Hispanic American Indian/Alaska Native, are about the same as the previous estimates.

  • Tennessee

    Populations by Race/Ethnicity

    Tennessee Population Graph (by Race/Ethnicity)

    For Tennessee, the new estimates for all race/ethnicity groups, non-Hispanic White, Hispanic, non-Hispanic Black, Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander, and non-Hispanic American Indian/Alaska Native, are about the same as the previous estimates.

  • Texas

    Populations by Race/Ethnicity

    Texas Population Graph (by Race/Ethnicity)

    For Texas, the new estimates for all race/ethnicity groups, non-Hispanic White, Hispanic, non-Hispanic Black, Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander, and non-Hispanic American Indian/Alaska Native, are about the same as the previous estimates.

  • Utah

    Populations by Race/Ethnicity

    Utah Population Graph (by Race/Ethnicity)

    For Utah, the new estimates for all race/ethnicity groups, non-Hispanic White, Hispanic, non-Hispanic Black, Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander, and non-Hispanic American Indian/Alaska Native, are about the same as the previous estimates.

  • Vermont

    Populations by Race/Ethnicity

    Vermont Population Graph (by Race/Ethnicity)

    For Vermont, the new estimates for non-Hispanic Whites, Hispanics, non-Hispanic Blacks and Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islanders are higher than previous estimates. The new estimates for non-Hispanic American Indian/Alaska Natives are about the same as the previous estimates.

  • Virginia

    Populations by Race/Ethnicity

    Viginia Population Graph (by Race/Ethnicity)

    For Virginia, the new estimates for all race/ethnicity groups, non-Hispanic White, Hispanic, non-Hispanic Black, Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander, and non-Hispanic American Indian/Alaska Native, are about the same as the previous estimates.

  • Washington

    Populations by Race/Ethnicity

    Washington Population Graph (by Race/Ethnicity)

    For Washington, the new estimates for all race/ethnicity groups, non-Hispanic White, Hispanic, non-Hispanic Black, Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander, and non-Hispanic American Indian/Alaska Native, are about the same as the previous estimates.

  • Seattle (Puget Sound) SEER Area

    Populations by Race/Ethnicity

    Seattle (Puget Sound) SEER Area Population Graph (by Race/Ethnicity)

    For the Seattle (Puget Sound) SEER area, the new estimates for all race/ethnicity groups, non-Hispanic White, Hispanic, non-Hispanic Black, Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander, and non-Hispanic American Indian/Alaska Native, are about the same as the previous estimates.

  • West Virginia

    Populations by Race/Ethnicity

    West Virginia Population Graph (by Race/Ethnicity)

    For West Virginia, the new estimates for all race/ethnicity groups, non-Hispanic White, Hispanic, non-Hispanic Black, Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander, and non-Hispanic American Indian/Alaska Native, are about the same as the previous estimates.

  • Wisconsin

    Populations by Race/Ethnicity

    Wisconsin Population Graph (by Race/Ethnicity)

    For Wisconsin, the new estimates for all race/ethnicity groups, non-Hispanic White, Hispanic, non-Hispanic Black, Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander, and non-Hispanic American Indian/Alaska Native, are about the same as the previous estimates.

  • Wyoming

    Populations by Race/Ethnicity

    Wyoming Population Graph (by Race/Ethnicity)

    For Wyoming, the new estimates for all race/ethnicity groups, non-Hispanic White, Hispanic, non-Hispanic Black, Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander, and non-Hispanic American Indian/Alaska Native, are about the same as the previous estimates.

Intercensal population impact on rates

At the national level, the new population estimates are not very different from the previous estimates. However, there are more significant differences at the state and county levels that may result in changes in previously published cancer rates. Since mortality rates depend on both the number of deaths and the population at risk, changes in the population are only one factor that impacts the rates. Changes in the population denominator can cause shifts in either direction for disease rate calculations based on the new populations.

We evaluated the impact of the new intercensal populations on the 2020 rates by comparing the 2020 rates estimated using the new intercensal population to the 2020 rates estimated using the 2020 vintage population. The 2020 vintage population is projected from the 2010 Census and does not take into account the 2020 Census.

  • All Cancer Sites

    Mortality Rates Absolute Value Percent Change for Diagnosis Year 2020 (New 2020 Intercensal-Projected 2020)/Projected 2020*

    Mortality Rates Absolute Value Percent Change for Diagnosis Year 2020 (New 2020 Intercensal-Projected 2020)/Projected 2020 - All Cancer Sites map

    The percentage change in 2020 state death rates from Vintage 2020 to Intercensal 2020 is 0 to 1.5% for most states. Two states have a percentage change greater than 4.5%. The rest are between 1.5 and 3%.

  • All Causes of Death

    Mortality Rates Absolute Value Percent Change for Diagnosis Year 2020 (New 2020 Intercensal-Projected 2020)/Projected 2020*

    Mortality Rates Absolute Value Percent Change for Diagnosis Year 2020 (New 2020 Intercensal-Projected 2020)/Projected 2020 - All Causes of Death map

    The percentage change in 2020 state death rates from Vintage 2020 to Intercensal 2020 is 0 to 1.5% for most states. Three states have a percentage change greater than 4.5%. The rest are between 1.5 and 3%.

  • Breast

    Mortality Rates Absolute Value Percent Change for Diagnosis Year 2020 (New 2020 Intercensal-Projected 2020)/Projected 2020*

    Mortality Rates Absolute Value Percent Change for Diagnosis Year 2020 (New 2020 Intercensal-Projected 2020)/Projected 2020 - Breast map

    The percentage change in 2020 state death rates from Vintage 2020 to Intercensal 2020 is 0 to 1.5% for most states. Three states have a percentage change greater than 4.5%. The rest are between 1.5 and 3%.

  • Colon and Rectum

    Mortality Rates Absolute Value Percent Change for Diagnosis Year 2020 (New 2020 Intercensal-Projected 2020)/Projected 2020*

    Mortality Rates Absolute Value Percent Change for Diagnosis Year 2020 (New 2020 Intercensal-Projected 2020)/Projected 2020 - Colon and Rectum map

    The percentage change in 2020 state death rates from Vintage 2020 to Intercensal 2020 is 0 to 1.5% for most states. Two states have a percentage change greater than 4.5%. The rest are between 1.5 and 3%.

  • Lung and Bronchus

    Mortality Rates Absolute Value Percent Change for Diagnosis Year 2020 (New 2020 Intercensal-Projected 2020)/Projected 2020*

    Mortality Rates Absolute Value Percent Change for Diagnosis Year 2020 (New 2020 Intercensal-Projected 2020)/Projected 2020 - Lung and Bronchus map

    The percentage change in 2020 state death rates from Vintage 2020 to Intercensal 2020 is 3 to 4.5% for most states. Two states have a percentage change greater than 4.5%. The rest are between 0 and 3%.

  • Prostate

    Mortality Rates Absolute Value Percent Change for Diagnosis Year 2020 (New 2020 Intercensal-Projected 2020)/Projected 2020*

    Mortality Rates Absolute Value Percent Change for Diagnosis Year 2020 (New 2020 Intercensal-Projected 2020)/Projected 2020 - Prostate map

    The percentage change in 2020 state death rates from Vintage 2020 to Intercensal 2020 is 3 to 4.5% for most states. Eight states have a percentage change greater than 4.5%. The rest are between 0 and 3%.

[Download Data for Mortality Rates Absolute Value Percent Change for Diagnosis Year 2020 (New 2020 Intercensal-Projected 2020)/Projected 2020* (XLSX, 15 KB)]

*Projected 2020 population are based on the Vintage 2020 data which was projected from the 2010 census