SEER Inquiry System - Question 20031080 Details

System Guide

Back to Search Results

SEER Inquiry System - Report

Produced: 01/09/2026 6:31 AM

Question 20031080

Export CSV Export PDF Print

Add to Report

Inquiry Details

References:

#1: SEER EOD-88, 3rd Ed, 151-152

#2: ICD-O-3, 30

Question:

Behavior Code/EOD-Extension--Bladder: How are these fields coded for a bladder tumor in which the pathologist states, "there is no definite invasion identified" but the urologist states the case as T1? See Description.

Discussion:

Patient presents with four bladder tumors, described as "each measuring close to 2 cm." A specimen was taken of only one of the tumors. The tops of the tumors were fulgurated, then vaporized methodically. No obvious tumor or residual was noted on re-inspection.

Pathology revealed papillary urothelial carcinoma, high grade, with no definite invasion identified. Small segments of muscularis propria were present. A comment read..."it is difficult to determine if lamina propria invasion is present due to marked necrosis and tissue fragmentation." Urologist staged this as AJCC cT2a, but based on the pathology findings changed it to cT1. The urologist insists this is invasive.

Answer:

For cases diagnosed 1998-2003: Because of the damage to the specimen from cautery and the insistence of the urologist that the tumor was invasive, code extension for this case to 15 based on the physician's TNM category of T1.

A T1 is invasive--code the behavior /3. The urologist is confident it is invasive, and will likely treat the patient accordingly.

Cancer Site Category:

Bladder

Data Item Category:

Behavior

Other Category:

N/A

Year:

2003