| Report | Question ID | Question | Discussion | Answer | Year |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
20260012 | First Course of Therapy/Hormone Therapy--Thyroid: Is Thyrogen (thyrotropin alpha) coded as hormone therapy when a patient is given Thyrogen as part of planned 2-day Thyrogen Stimulated I-131 treatment for a papillary or follicular cancer? See Discussion. |
SEER*Rx categorizes Thyrogen as Hormones and hormonal mechanisms/Thyroid stimulating hormone. Probably not cancer directed–verify with attending MD. |
Do not code Thyrogen as hormone therapy when given as a stimulating agent in I-131 therapy. The therapeutic agent is I-131. The Thyrogen/thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) is sensitizing the gland to absorb more I-131. Thyrogen/TSH is a trophic hormone so it can cause growth of cancer cells. Thyroid hormones are given in follicular and papillary thyroid cancers to suppress TSH. Although Thyrogen can promote cancer growth its use in Thyrogen stimulated I-131 radioactive therapy is justified (benefits exceed the risk), since the use is short (2 days) and the high amount of I-131 would kill cancer cells in addition to majority of thyroid tissue. We will update the Thyrogen entry in SEER*Rx and clarify in the next release of the SEER manual, Appendix C Coding Guidelines for Thyroid. |
2026 |
|
|
20260011 | Reportability/Histology--Breast: 2026: Is lobular neoplasia (atypical lobular hyperplasia) reportable? There is no mention of grade and or conclusive lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) statement given. |
Do not report a case of atypical lobular hyperplasia of the breast until/unless it is definitively diagnosed as LCIS or another reportable neoplasm. WHO defines this as a non-invasive lobular neoplasia. Atypical lobular hyperplasia does not have an ICD-O code and is not equivalent to in situ. |
2026 | |
|
|
20260008 | Reportability/Ambiguous Terminology--Heme & Lymphoid Neoplasms: Should "consistent with" be included in the ambiguous terminology for reportability list in the updated Heme Manual? See Discussion. |
In the Heme Manual, published October 2025, the ambiguous terminology used to determine reportability for heme and lymphoid neoplasms (Case Reportability Instructions) was updated and "consistent with" was removed. However, this is an ambiguous term that is used to describe reportability (and not just histology). The term "consistent with" was previously included as a reportable ambiguous term used to report cases prior to this update. The updated Heme Manual is clear regarding "consistent with" now being a definitive diagnosis for the purpose of coding histology. However, the Note under instruction 4 states, "Do not apply these changes to casefinding, reportability, or staging." Is "consistent with" an exception to this Note? Or should it be re-added to the ambiguous terms related to reportability? |
The 2027 version of the Hematopoietic Manual (release October 2026) will include the following in the Case Reportability Instructions, pg. 40: 4. “Consistent with” for reportability and casefinding is now a definitive diagnosis and is no longer ambiguous terminology. This is for hematopoietic neoplasms ONLY. a. “Consistent with” has become a very common way for pathologists to document diagnoses for Hematopoietic neoplasms. In order to ensure that hematopoietic cases are being reported, “consistent with” has now become definitive terminology for casefinding and reportability (see Histology Coding Instructions for assigning histology). b. Do not apply this instruction to casefinding and reportability for Solid Tumors. 5. Report the case when the diagnosis of a hematopoietic neoplasm is preceded by one or more of the ambiguous terms listed below: a. This instruction pertains to reportability and case finding only. See the Histology Coding Instructions, #3-5 for instructions on assigning histology with ambiguous terminology (note that “consistent with” has been removed. See Note #4) .
|
2026 |
|
|
20260006 | First Course of Therapy--Heme & Lymphoid Neoplasms: How is first course of treatment coded for hematopoietic and lymphoid neoplasm (heme) cases who are put on surveillance for years while asymptomatic and then start chemotherapy or other treatment years later once they become symptomatic? See Discussion. |
Patient was diagnosed with smoldering myeloma in October 2021 and put on surveillance. In May 2024, the patient became symptomatic and started chemotherapy. Is the date of diagnosis in 2021, with date of first treatment with chemotherapy in 2024? Or is active surveillance first course and treatment with chemotherapy as second course in 2024? |
Code the first course of treatment as active surveillance. Chemotherapy is second course of treatment based on this scenario due to progression. We will add clarification about this type of scenario to the Heme Manual for the 2027 update. |
2026 |
|
|
20260004 | Solid Tumor Rules/Multiple Primaries--Breast: How many primaries and which Breast Solid Tumor Rules (STR) M Rule applies when a patient has synchronous, separate/non-contiguous breast tumors which are a ductal carcinoma and a separate lobular carcinoma? See Discussion. |
Historically, synchronous ductal and lobular tumors have been accessioned as a single primary. These were previously covered under Rule M10, which was removed from the (STR) Manual 2026 Update. While the previous iteration of Rule M10 was problematic, the main issue related to the lack of a timing component within the rule (i.e., indicating it applied to synchronous ductal and lobular tumors). Using the current Breast STR, when there are two (or more) simultaneous tumors which are not mixed lobular and ductal within each tumor, the applicable M Rule is Rule M13: Abstract multiple primaries when separate/non-contiguous tumors are on different rows in Table 3. To apply the M Rules, a provisional histology must be assigned to EACH tumor so we cannot code each tumor as 8522 before we start applying the M Rules. These provisional histologies would be 8500 and 8520, and these are on different rows in Table 3. |
Accession two primaries when a patient has synchronous, separate ductal and lobular tumors using Rule M13, Breast STRs, 2026 Update. Ductal carcinoma (8500/3) and lobular carcinoma (8520/3) are distinct histology terms and codes that are in different rows in Table 3. This is a modification of Rules M10 and H28 from prior versions of the STR Manual. |
2026 |
|
|
20260003 | Solid Tumor Rules/Histology--Thyroid: What is the correct histology for invasive encapsulated follicular variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma (IEFVPTC)? The 2026 Solid Tumor Rules (STR) Manual, Other Sites Table 12, conflicts with the ICD-O-3.2. See Discussion. |
STR Manual, Table 12, Thyroid Histologies, includes "Invasive encapsulated follicular variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma" as histology 8340/3 and is on its own row from other papillary thyroid carcinomas (PTC). A new footnote was added which states, "IEFVPTC and Infiltrative follicular variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma (a PTC subtype) share a histology code, but they are distinctly different histologies. They are on different rows of the table and are different primaries." However, IEFVPTC (and its synonyms) are listed in the ICD-O-3.2 as 8343/3, and 8343/3 was listed as a subtype/variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma in previous versions of the STR Manual. |
Assign histology as 8340/3 for IEFVPTC using the STR Manual, 2026 Update. Rule M18, Note 2, of the Other Sites STR state: Invasive encapsulated follicular variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma and Infiltrative follicular variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma share a histology code (8340) but are distinctly different entities. They are on separate rows of the table. WHO Classification of Endocrine and Neuroendocrine Tumors, 5th ed., indicates that after classic PTC, the follicular variant of PTC (FVPTC) is the second most common histological subtype of PTC. Two major forms are known, infiltrative FVPTC and invasive encapsulated FVPTC. The majority of follicular PTCs are encapsulated FVPTCs, whereas infiltrative FVPTC is quite rare and clinically behaves like classic PTC. |
2026 |
|
|
20260001 | SEER Manual/Surgery of Primary Site--Ovary: Should "(salpingo)" be removed in the SEER Note under Ovary surgery code A280? See Discussion. |
Code A280 is defined as a total removal of the ovarian tumor or removal of a single ovary (oophorectomy) WITH a hysterectomy. The unilateral removal of both the fallopian tube and ovary [(salpingo-) oophorectomy] is included in surgery codes A350-A370. However, the SEER Note under code A280 states, "Also use code A280 for current unilateral (salpingo-) oophorectomy with previous history of hysterectomy." Should this SEER Note read, "Also use code A280 for current unilateral oophorectomy with previous history of hysterectomy"? |
Assign code A280 for current unilateral oophorectomy with hysterectomy or with a previous history of hysterectomy. We will remove the text ‘(salpingo-)’ from the Ovary surgery code A280 SEER Note in the next release of SEER Manual. |
2026 |
|
|
20250031 | SEER Manual/Reportability/Histology: Is severe dysplasia reportable? This is commonly listed as a synonym for high grade dysplasia. Is this term "severe dysplasia" reportable in the sites where high grade dysplasia is reportable? This is listed as a synonym, but it is not clear. See Discussion.
|
We are seeing cases on this in head and neck. The College of American Pathologists Oral Cancer Protocol is showing this as keratinizing dysplasia, severe (carcinoma in situ) and nonkeratinizing dysplasia, severe (carcinoma in situ). SINQ Question 20230047 shows it as reportable for head and neck. |
Report severe dysplasia for selected sites. Not all high grade dysplasia and severe dysplasia are reportable. Refer to the list of examples in the SEER Manual Reportability Section and Appendix E, Reportable and Non-reportable Examples. Check also for other standard setters, state, and local reportability requirements. High grade dysplasia, severe dysplasia, and carcinoma in situ are equivalent terms with behavior /2. Refer to ICD-O, WHO Classification of Tumors, and the SEER Solid Tumor Rules for preferred histology terms and codes. For example, WHO Classification of Head and Neck Tumors, 5th edition, states carcinoma in situ in the oral cavity is synonymous with severe dysplasia though it is not a recommended term. |
2025 |
|
|
20250030 | First Course of Therapy/Hormone Therapy--Meningioma: Should Sandostatin be coded as treatment for a Grade 1 meningioma? Patient had surgery and was somatostatin receptor 2 (SSTR2) positive by immunohistochemistry. |
Code Sandostatin (octreotide acetate) as hormonal therapy when given including: · SSTR 2 positive meningioma (NCCN, 2025: smaller studies support the use of targeted therapy including somatostatin) · Neuroendocrine tumor (NET) (NCCN, 2025: Tumor control: antitumor effect is supported by studies for well-differentiated G1/G2 gastro-entero-pancreatic NET. In lung/thymic NET, somatostatin analogues may be considered if metastatic or SSTR positive). The SEER*Rx entry for Octreotide Acetate was updated as studies showed somatostatin analogs may shrink tumors or inhibit further growth. |
2025 | |
|
|
20250029 | EOD 2018/EOD Regional Nodes--Oropharynx: Is code 550 missing “< equal to 6 cm” in the data item EOD Regional Nodes for Oropharynx HPV-Associated, Version 9? Otherwise, bilateral or contralateral lymph nodes with extranodal extension (ENE) that are >6 cm could fit into 550 OR 650. |
Code 550 is missing “< equal to 6 cm.” In addition, code 650 should include ipsilateral lymph nodes as well. Revised codes: Code 550 CLINICAL ASSESSMENT only Bilateral or contralateral lymph nodes, < equal to 6 cm WITH clinical evidence of ENE Code 650 CLINICAL ASSESSMENT only Ipsilateral, Bilateral or Contralateral lymph nodes > 6 cm WITH or WITHOUT clinical evidence of ENE These changes will be implemented in Version 3.4 (October 2026). We apologize for the error. |
2025 |
Home
