An official website of the United States government
Home
SEER Inquiry System - Report
Produced: 03/21/2025 12:05 PM
Question 20021015
Inquiry Details
References:
Question:
Ambiguous Terminology/Reportability: How should the expressions "suspicious for but not diagnostic of" and "suspicious for the possibility of early invasive adenocarcinoma" be interpreted for reportability? Would the interpretation be different depending on the primary site?
Discussion:
Answer:
For reportability, interpret "suspicious for but not diagnostic of" as NOT diagnostic of cancer.
The phrase "suspicious for the possibility of early invasive adenocarcinoma" may indicate that the case is in situ. If no further information is available, this is not reportable.
The site of the cancer diagnosis does not change the interpretation.
Cancer Site Category:
N/A
Data Item Category:
N/A
Other Category:
Reportability, Ambiguous terminology
Year:
2002
