SEER Inquiry System - Question 20031141 Details

System Guide

Back to Search Results

SEER Inquiry System - Report

Produced: 11/24/2024 6:13 AM

Question 20031141

Export CSV Export PDF Print

Add to Report

Inquiry Details

References:

SEER EOD-88, 3rd Ed, 9. January 1998

Question:

Priorities/EOD-Lymph Nodes--Breast: Which part of the pathology report takes precedence when there is a discrepancy between the final path diagnosis and the CAP summary? See Description.

Discussion:

For example, breast primary: Final path states "14/18 nodes (+) for tumor & separate matted aggregate of axillary nodes (+) for tumor. Subpectoral lymph node (+) for mets ca. Path Gross states "18 separate lymph nodes identified...many (+) for tumor grossly. Aggregate of matted lymph nodes within axillary tissue (+) for tumor. Multiple separate lymph nodes submitted." CAP Micro Summary lists "20/16 nodes examined/positive." What is correct number of nodes positive & nodes examined in this case?

Answer:

For cases diagnosed 1998-2003: The final pathology diagnosis has highest priority. The CAP summary is second priority. However, you always use the best information available. If the final path diagnosis is vague or unclear, information from the CAP summary can be used. In the case example, the total lymph node count from the final path diagnosis is unclear and the CAP summary provides clarification. Code the number of lymph nodes positive as 16 and the number examined 20. Subpectoral lymph nodes are regional nodes for breast primaries.

Cancer Site Category:

Breast

Data Item Category:

N/A

Other Category:

N/A

Year:

2003