| Report | Question ID | Question | Discussion | Answer | Cancer Site Category | Data Item Category | Year |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
20260024 | SEER Manual/First Course Treatment/Other Therapy--Uterus: Is Metformin coded to Other Therapy code 1 vs 6? Multiple GYN physicians have stated, “Adenocarcinoma of Endometrium, treating with intrauterine device and Metformin.” The patient is not on any specified trials. |
Code Other Therapy to 6 (Other-Unproven) since Metformin is not included in oncology guidelines and studies show controversial results at this time. |
Corpus uteri | Chemotherapy, First course treatment | 2026 | |
|
|
20260023 | SEER Manual/First Course Treatment/Other Therapy--Breast: How is the agent endoxifen coded when given to treat hormone sensitive breast cancer? This agent is not listed in SEER*Rx. |
Code as Other Therapy, code 2 (other-experimental). Endoxifen is currently in phase 2 studies and not FDA approved standard treatment at present. |
Breast | First course treatment, Other therapy | 2026 | |
|
|
20260022 | First Course Treatment/Other Therapy--Glioblastoma: Is Dendritic Cell/Tumor Cell Electrofusion Cancer Vaccine, coded to Immunotherapy as stated in SEER*Rx? A patient, diagnosed with Glioblastoma (GBM) IDH-wildtype (CNS WHO grade 4), in addition to radiation and chemotherapy, was enrolled on Diakonos/DOC-DBM study, randomized to the vaccine arm. It seems this study evaluates dubodencel, a novel dendritic cell vaccine treating GBM. |
Code dubodencel to Other Therapy, code 2 (other-experimental). Dubodencel is not technically Dendritic Cell/Tumor Cell Electrofusion Cancer Vaccine, though close. However, both are in early stages of clinical development. We updated the coding instructions for Dendritic Cell/Tumor Cell Electrofusion Cancer Vaccine in SEER*Rx. |
Brain and CNS | First course treatment, Other therapy | 2026 | |
|
|
20260021 | First Course Treatment/Heme & Lymphoid Neoplasms--Multiple Myeloma: Is treatment for multiple myeloma coded as first-course treatment until patient achieves remission despite the possibility of progression due to a delay in treatment? A patient with multiple myeloma was advised treatment with Dara-RVD followed by a stem cell transplant. As the patient wanted to take care of another health issue, the patient waited 8 months to start treatment. |
Code treatment as first course of treatment, even though there was an 8-month delay. The patient's treatment plan was to delay the cancer treatment due to another health condition. When that health condition was resolved, then the cancer treatment was given. Patients do delay treatment for many different reasons, but most of them would not be 8 months. This fits the new rule which is all treatment is first course until remission. This is different from active surveillance, where the patient is being monitored for symptoms/disease progression. We have a clarification coming out in the 2027 updates that states if Active Surveillance is the planned treatment until symptoms appear, that any treatment received after active surveillance is second course. That is not the situation here. This is delayed therapy. |
Heme & Lymphoid Neoplasms | First course treatment | 2026 | |
|
|
20260020 | Radiation Therapy: Is I 131 sodium iodide coded as radiation? SINQ 20031040 says to code Radiation as 3 (radioisotope) but SEER*Rx says not to code it. |
Code sodium iodine (I 131) therapy in Radiation Treatment Modality as code 13 (Radioisotopes, NOS). Code Radiation External Beam Planning Technique as code 88 (not applicable). Do not code if used in diagnostic procedures. Radioactive I 131 should be coded when given in therapeutic doses (usually 30-50mCi but could be higher in high risk patients). The same agent is used for diagnostic imaging, but the dose is very small (1-3mCi). We will update SEER*Rx. |
N/A | Radiation Therapy | 2026 | |
|
|
20260019 | Immunotherapy--Heme & Lymphoid Neoplasms: Should Anti-Thymocyte Globulin (ATG)/Cyclosporine/Prednisone be coded for myelodysplastic dysplastic syndrome (MDS) and if so, how should it be coded? See Discussion. |
Patient failed treatment with Azacitidine for MDS with multilineage dysplasia (9985/3) diagnosed 1/2024, and on re-biopsy of bone marrow 11/2025, histology is now MDS with excess blasts (9989/3). These diagnoses are the same primary using the Hematopoietic and Lymphoid Neoplasms (Heme) Database. The physician has prescribed treatment of Anti-Thymocyte Globulin (ATG)/Cyclosporine/Prednisone. SEER*Rx Database says not to code as ATG and Cyclosporine are antirejection medications post-transplant, but the oncologist is using this combination for treatment. |
Code ATG/Cyclosporine as biological response modifier (BRM)/Immunotherapy as first course of treatment using the current Heme Manual. Based on changes to the 2026 Heme rules for coding treatment, heme and lymphoid neoplasms are now treated differently than Solid Tumors when it comes to treatment failure. It can be used for treatment of selected MDS cases particularly those with low-risk disease, HLA-DR15 histocompatibility type, bone marrow hypoplasia. Prednisone should not be coded as it is not disease modifying agent in MDS. It is usually given to reduce/treat infusion reactions/serum sickness associated with ATG infusion. We will update SEER*Rx. |
Heme & Lymphoid Neoplasms | Immunotherapy | 2026 |
|
|
20260017 | Multiple Primaries/Histology--Heme & Lymphoid Neoplasms: Should histology be coded as 9895 when the pathologist's diagnosis on the bone marrow biopsy is "consistent with transformation of the patient's known polycythemia vera to acute myeloid leukemia?" See Discussion. |
The patient has a known history of polycythemia vera (PV). The Hematopoietic and Lymphoid Neoplasms Database (Heme DB) entry for myelodysplasia-related acute myeloid leukemia ("acute myeloid leukemia post myelodysplastic-myeloproliferative neoplasm") states, "The pathologist must make the diagnosis of being myelodysplasia-related." However, it's unclear if the pathologist's statement of an acute myeloid leukemia (AML) "transforming from" counts as the AML being myelodysplasia-related since AML can arise/transform from PV. The Heme DB does indicate histology 9895 should not automatically be used just because the patient has a history of MPN. The bone marrow did not identify any of the specific cytogenetic or molecular abnormalities listed in the Heme DB. However, next generation sequencing identified mutations in BCOR, DNMT3A, IDH1, JAK2, EZH2. The managing physician's clinical diagnosis was "AML arising from polycythemia vera." |
Assign a second primary as Acute Myeloid Leukemia, NOS (9861/3), per Rule M10, the first being polycythemia vera (9950/3). The physician states “consistent with transformation of the patient's known polycythemia vera to acute myeloid leukemia.” This is not the same thing as “Acute myeloid leukemia with myelodysplasia-related changes.” The Heme DB states: Do not automatically assign this histology (Acute myeloid leukemia with myelodysplasia-related changes (9895/3) if patient has a history of a myeloproliferative neoplasm (Myelodysplastic Syndrome [MDS], or Myeloproliferative Neoplasm [MPN]). Note: Polycythemia Vera is a Myeloproliferative Neoplasm (MPN). The pathologist must make the diagnosis of being myelodysplasia-related. |
Heme & Lymphoid Neoplasms | Histology | 2026 |
|
|
20260016 | Solid Tumor Rules/Histology--Head & Neck: How is the histology of a sinonasal tumor coded when the initial biopsy addendum diagnosis is "High-grade malignant neoplasm with features in between olfactory neuroblastoma and large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma" and the repeat biopsy diagnosis is "High-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma?" See Discussion. |
The patient has an overlapping sinonasal tumor and only underwent diagnostic biopsies of the ethmoid sinus component. Neither biopsy can be determined to be the more representative specimen. The initial biopsy, addendum diagnosis, states there are features in between olfactory neuroblastoma and large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma. The addendum comment states the findings, "makes the distinction between olfactory neuroblastoma (ONB) and neuroendocrine carcinoma difficult." The final diagnosis on the repeat biopsy (approx. 2 weeks later) was high grade neuroendocrine carcinoma, but the diagnosis comment states, "There are no features to suggest underlying olfactory neuroblastoma; however, the material may not be representative of the entire tumor." The managing physician states this is most consistent with olfactory neuroblastoma (esthesioneuroblastoma) in the medical record. If this were a mixed histology tumor, there is no applicable H Rule in the Head & Neck schema. It is unclear which biopsy diagnosis to use since there is conflicting information. Should this be coded as an olfactory neuroblastoma per the initial biopsy diagnosis and the diagnosis provided by the physician? Or should this be a high grade neuroendocrine carcinoma as it is likely the tumor component with the worst prognosis? |
Assign 9522/3 (olfactory neuroblastoma) as a single histology to this case based on the initial pathology and managing physician’s diagnosis. World Health Organization Classification Head and Neck Tumors, 5th edition defines olfactory neuroblastoma as a malignant neuroectodermal neoplasm derived from the specialized sensory olfactory neuroepithelium. |
Head & Neck | Histology | 2026 |
|
|
20260015 | SEER Manual/Histology--Ovary: How are Primary Site and Histology coded for a serous borderline tumor of the right ovary with malignant cells in the ascitic fluid? See Discussion. |
Patient has a CT of the abdomen and pelvis that shows a 11.6 cm mixed cystic-solid right adnexal mass most concerning for malignancy. She then has a right salpingo-oophorectomy with numerous adhesions throughout abdomen/pelvis; mass emanating from right ovary, well encapsulated, filling the entire cul-de sac pelvic cavity; left ovary not found, uterus absent. Pathology: Right Ovary Integrity: Capsule ruptured; Tumor Site: Right ovary; Tumor Size: Greatest Dimension (Centimeters) - 7 cm; Histologic Type: Serous borderline tumor; Histologic Grade: GB, borderline tumor; Ovarian Surface Involvement: Not identified; Fallopian Tube Surface Involvement: Not identified; Implants: Not sampled; Other Tissue / Organ Involvement: Not applicable; Peritoneal / Ascitic Fluid Involvement: Malignant cells present; Chemotherapy Response Score (CRS): No known presurgical therapy; REGIONAL LYMPH NODES Regional Lymph Node Status: Not applicable (no regional lymph nodes submitted or found) pT Category: pT1c3; pN Category: pN not assigned (no nodes submitted or found); FIGO Stage: IC3 |
Report this ovarian tumor as histology 8442/3. Our subject matter expert, a specialized pathologist who deems this case reportable, advises if a rupture occurs, the presence of borderline tumor cells in peritoneal fluid is considered true tumor spread and malignant. Both ICD-O-3.2 and ICD-O-4 classify this as behavior /1 (Serous borderline tumor, NOS); however, based on the matrix rule, you should be able to update the behavior to /3. If you cannot override or enter it into your software, please contact your vendor. Cancer PathCHART guidance for 8442/3 in the ovary recommends using 8460/3 (Low-grade serous carcinoma) or 8461/3 (High-grade serous carcinoma). Code 8442/3 should be used only when the grade cannot be determined. |
Ovary | Histology | 2026 |
|
|
20260014 | First Course Therapy/Hormone Therapy--Thyroid: Should Armour thyroid be coded as hormone therapy for a thyroid cancer case status post thyroidectomy at an outside facility who continues Armour thyroid at another facility? Armour thyroid is not listed in SEER*Rx. |
Armour thyroid is listed under "Thyroid" in SEER*Rx and in Appendix C Thyroid Coding Guidelines of the 2026 SEER Program Coding and Staging Manual. Code natural thyroid products as hormonal therapy in papillary, follicular, or oncocytic thyroid carcinoma. Thyroid histology must be known as coding depends on histology. Do not code if it is medullary or anaplastic thyroid carcinoma. If histology is unknown, assign Hormone Therapy as code 99. In papillary, follicular, and oncocytic carcinoma, natural or synthetic thyroid hormone products have a dual role: 1. Suppression of thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH): This is cancer directed therapy since the tumor cells of the above mentioned morphologies express TSH receptor. TSH is a trophic hormone that can promote tumor growth. 2. Hormonal replacement therapy to treat post-surgical or post-radiation hypothyroidism. C-cells in medullary carcinoma do not express TSH receptor, thus, TSH suppression would not be indicated. However, replacement hormonal therapy with synthetic or natural thyroid hormones post surgery is given to treat the post-surgical hypothyroidism. In operable thyroid anaplastic carcinoma, the goal of levothyroxine therapy is hormone replacement. The Thyroid Coding Guidelines are being updated to include oncocytic thyroid cancer in the 2027 release of the SEER Manual. |
Thyroid | Hormone Therapy | 2026 |
Home
