| Report | Question ID | Question | Discussion | Answer | Cancer Site Category | Data Item Category | Year |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
20260006 | First Course of Therapy--Heme & Lymphoid Neoplasms: How is first course of treatment coded for hematopoietic and lymphoid neoplasm (heme) cases who are put on surveillance for years while asymptomatic and then start chemotherapy or other treatment years later once they become symptomatic? See Discussion. |
Patient was diagnosed with smoldering myeloma in October 2021 and put on surveillance. In May 2024, the patient became symptomatic and started chemotherapy. Is the date of diagnosis in 2021, with date of first treatment with chemotherapy in 2024? Or is active surveillance first course and treatment with chemotherapy as second course in 2024? |
Updated June 2026 Code the first course of treatment as active surveillance. Chemotherapy is second course of treatment based on this scenario due to progression. We will be adding clarification about this type of scenario to the treatment rules in the 2027 updates, which will be released October 2026. |
Heme & Lymphoid Neoplasms | N/A | 2026 |
|
|
20260008 | Reportability/Ambiguous Terminology--Heme & Lymphoid Neoplasms: Should "consistent with" be included in the ambiguous terminology for reportability list in the updated Heme Manual? See Discussion. |
In the Heme Manual, published October 2025, the ambiguous terminology used to determine reportability for heme and lymphoid neoplasms (Case Reportability Instructions) was updated and "consistent with" was removed. However, this is an ambiguous term that is used to describe reportability (and not just histology). The term "consistent with" was previously included as a reportable ambiguous term used to report cases prior to this update. The updated Heme Manual is clear regarding "consistent with" now being a definitive diagnosis for the purpose of coding histology. However, the Note under instruction 4 states, "Do not apply these changes to casefinding, reportability, or staging." Is "consistent with" an exception to this Note? Or should it be re-added to the ambiguous terms related to reportability? |
The 2027 version of the Hematopoietic Manual (release October 2026) will include the following in the Case Reportability Instructions, pg. 40: 4. “Consistent with” for reportability and casefinding is now a definitive diagnosis and is no longer ambiguous terminology. This is for hematopoietic neoplasms ONLY. a. “Consistent with” has become a very common way for pathologists to document diagnoses for Hematopoietic neoplasms. In order to ensure that hematopoietic cases are being reported, “consistent with” has now become definitive terminology for casefinding and reportability (see Histology Coding Instructions for assigning histology). b. Do not apply this instruction to casefinding and reportability for Solid Tumors. 5. Report the case when the diagnosis of a hematopoietic neoplasm is preceded by one or more of the ambiguous terms listed below: a. This instruction pertains to reportability and case finding only. See the Histology Coding Instructions, #3-5 for instructions on assigning histology with ambiguous terminology (note that “consistent with” has been removed. See Note #4) .
|
Heme & Lymphoid Neoplasms | N/A | 2026 |
|
|
20260013 | Primary Site--Colon: How is primary site assigned when the only documented term is “colorectal cancer?” See Discussion. |
Patient is diagnosed with adenocarcinoma documented by the physician as “colorectal cancer.” The medical record does not specify colon, rectosigmoid, rectum, or any specific segment of the large intestine. There is also no imaging, operative, endoscopic, or pathology documentation identifying a more precise site of origin. Specifically, should the registrar assign: · C18.9 — Colon NOS - (excludes rectum, NOS C20.9 and rectosigmoid junction C19.9) · C19.9 — Rectosigmoid junction · C20.9 — Rectum NOS · C26.0 — Intestinal tract, NOS · C26.9 — Gastrointestinal tract, NOS · or another site |
Assign primary site as colon, NOS (C18.9) when the only information about the diagnosis you have is "colorectal cancer." We consulted with a subject matter expert who believes that colon, NOS is closest to being correct and that rectosigmoid is not appropriate. If further information becomes available through further workup and/or treatment, update the primary site as appropriate. We will add clarification to the 2027 SEER Manual, Appendix C, Colon Coding Guidelines. |
Colon | Primary site | 2026 |
|
|
20260003 | Solid Tumor Rules/Histology--Thyroid: What is the correct histology for invasive encapsulated follicular variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma (IEFVPTC)? The 2026 Solid Tumor Rules (STR) Manual, Other Sites Table 12, conflicts with the ICD-O-3.2. See Discussion. |
STR Manual, Table 12, Thyroid Histologies, includes "Invasive encapsulated follicular variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma" as histology 8340/3 and is on its own row from other papillary thyroid carcinomas (PTC). A new footnote was added which states, "IEFVPTC and Infiltrative follicular variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma (a PTC subtype) share a histology code, but they are distinctly different histologies. They are on different rows of the table and are different primaries." However, IEFVPTC (and its synonyms) are listed in the ICD-O-3.2 as 8343/3, and 8343/3 was listed as a subtype/variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma in previous versions of the STR Manual. |
Assign histology as 8340/3 for IEFVPTC using the STR Manual, 2026 Update. Rule M18, Note 2, of the Other Sites STR state: Invasive encapsulated follicular variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma and Infiltrative follicular variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma share a histology code (8340) but are distinctly different entities. They are on separate rows of the table. WHO Classification of Endocrine and Neuroendocrine Tumors, 5th ed., indicates that after classic PTC, the follicular variant of PTC (FVPTC) is the second most common histological subtype of PTC. Two major forms are known, infiltrative FVPTC and invasive encapsulated FVPTC. The majority of follicular PTCs are encapsulated FVPTCs, whereas infiltrative FVPTC is quite rare and clinically behaves like classic PTC. |
Thyroid | Histology | 2026 |
|
|
20260017 | Multiple Primaries/Histology--Heme & Lymphoid Neoplasms: Should histology be coded as 9895 when the pathologist's diagnosis on the bone marrow biopsy is "consistent with transformation of the patient's known polycythemia vera to acute myeloid leukemia?" See Discussion. |
The patient has a known history of polycythemia vera (PV). The Hematopoietic and Lymphoid Neoplasms Database (Heme DB) entry for myelodysplasia-related acute myeloid leukemia ("acute myeloid leukemia post myelodysplastic-myeloproliferative neoplasm") states, "The pathologist must make the diagnosis of being myelodysplasia-related." However, it's unclear if the pathologist's statement of an acute myeloid leukemia (AML) "transforming from" counts as the AML being myelodysplasia-related since AML can arise/transform from PV. The Heme DB does indicate histology 9895 should not automatically be used just because the patient has a history of MPN. The bone marrow did not identify any of the specific cytogenetic or molecular abnormalities listed in the Heme DB. However, next generation sequencing identified mutations in BCOR, DNMT3A, IDH1, JAK2, EZH2. The managing physician's clinical diagnosis was "AML arising from polycythemia vera." |
Assign a second primary as Acute Myeloid Leukemia, NOS (9861/3), per Rule M10, the first being polycythemia vera (9950/3). The physician states “consistent with transformation of the patient's known polycythemia vera to acute myeloid leukemia.” This is not the same thing as “Acute myeloid leukemia with myelodysplasia-related changes.” The Heme DB states: Do not automatically assign this histology (Acute myeloid leukemia with myelodysplasia-related changes (9895/3) if patient has a history of a myeloproliferative neoplasm (Myelodysplastic Syndrome [MDS], or Myeloproliferative Neoplasm [MPN]). Note: Polycythemia Vera is a Myeloproliferative Neoplasm (MPN). The pathologist must make the diagnosis of being myelodysplasia-related. |
Heme & Lymphoid Neoplasms | Histology | 2026 |
|
|
20260015 | SEER Manual/Histology--Ovary: How are Primary Site and Histology coded for a serous borderline tumor of the right ovary with malignant cells in the ascitic fluid? See Discussion. |
Patient has a CT of the abdomen and pelvis that shows a 11.6 cm mixed cystic-solid right adnexal mass most concerning for malignancy. She then has a right salpingo-oophorectomy with numerous adhesions throughout abdomen/pelvis; mass emanating from right ovary, well encapsulated, filling the entire cul-de sac pelvic cavity; left ovary not found, uterus absent. Pathology: Right Ovary Integrity: Capsule ruptured; Tumor Site: Right ovary; Tumor Size: Greatest Dimension (Centimeters) - 7 cm; Histologic Type: Serous borderline tumor; Histologic Grade: GB, borderline tumor; Ovarian Surface Involvement: Not identified; Fallopian Tube Surface Involvement: Not identified; Implants: Not sampled; Other Tissue / Organ Involvement: Not applicable; Peritoneal / Ascitic Fluid Involvement: Malignant cells present; Chemotherapy Response Score (CRS): No known presurgical therapy; REGIONAL LYMPH NODES Regional Lymph Node Status: Not applicable (no regional lymph nodes submitted or found) pT Category: pT1c3; pN Category: pN not assigned (no nodes submitted or found); FIGO Stage: IC3 |
Report this ovarian tumor as histology 8442/3. Our subject matter expert, a specialized pathologist who deems this case reportable, advises if a rupture occurs, the presence of borderline tumor cells in peritoneal fluid is considered true tumor spread and malignant. Both ICD-O-3.2 and ICD-O-4 classify this as behavior /1 (Serous borderline tumor, NOS); however, based on the matrix rule, you should be able to update the behavior to /3. If you cannot override or enter it into your software, please contact your vendor. Cancer PathCHART guidance for 8442/3 in the ovary recommends using 8460/3 (Low-grade serous carcinoma) or 8461/3 (High-grade serous carcinoma). Code 8442/3 should be used only when the grade cannot be determined. |
Ovary | Histology | 2026 |
|
|
20260020 | Radiation Therapy: Is I 131 sodium iodide coded as radiation? SINQ 20031040 says to code Radiation as 3 (radioisotope) but SEER*Rx says not to code it. |
Code sodium iodine (I 131) therapy in Radiation Treatment Modality as code 13 (Radioisotopes, NOS). Code Radiation External Beam Planning Technique as code 88 (not applicable). Do not code if used in diagnostic procedures. Radioactive I 131 should be coded when given in therapeutic doses (usually 30-50mCi but could be higher in high risk patients). The same agent is used for diagnostic imaging, but the dose is very small (1-3mCi). We will update SEER*Rx. |
N/A | Radiation Therapy | 2026 | |
|
|
20260010 | Reportability/Histology--Breast: Is a spindle cell neoplasm with CLCN6::BRAF fusion reportable? If yes, how is the histology coded? See Discussion. |
A right breast lumpectomy identified a spindle cell neoplasm with CLCN6::BRAF fusion. The diagnosis comment states, "There is limited data on spindle cell neoplasms with this specific fusion, therefore the outcome/malignant potential is unclear. The lesion is well circumscribed with low grade morphology but shows increased cellularity and mitotic activity that reaches 40 mitoses per 10 high power fields, which may be better considered as sarcoma for therapy purposes.” The physician clinically calls it a spindle cell sarcoma. Is this a reportable emerging sarcoma histology? |
Report this case of spindle cell neoplasm with CLCN6::BRAF fusion based on the physician diagnosis of spindle cell sarcoma (8801/3). CLCN6::BRAF is described as rare kinase fusion identified in a subset of spindle cell sarcomas. It is part of an expanding group of BRAF fusions in spindle cell neoplasms though it not extensively detailed in the literature. Along with other BRAF fusions, CLCN6::BRAF represents a potential oncogenic driver for targeted therapy. |
Breast | Histology | 2026 |
|
|
20260014 | First Course Therapy/Hormone Therapy--Thyroid: Should Armour thyroid be coded as hormone therapy for a thyroid cancer case status post thyroidectomy at an outside facility who continues Armour thyroid at another facility? Armour thyroid is not listed in SEER*Rx. |
Armour thyroid is listed under "Thyroid" in SEER*Rx and in Appendix C Thyroid Coding Guidelines of the 2026 SEER Program Coding and Staging Manual. Code natural thyroid products as hormonal therapy in papillary, follicular, or oncocytic thyroid carcinoma. Thyroid histology must be known as coding depends on histology. Do not code if it is medullary or anaplastic thyroid carcinoma. If histology is unknown, assign Hormone Therapy as code 99. In papillary, follicular, and oncocytic carcinoma, natural or synthetic thyroid hormone products have a dual role: 1. Suppression of thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH): This is cancer directed therapy since the tumor cells of the above mentioned morphologies express TSH receptor. TSH is a trophic hormone that can promote tumor growth. 2. Hormonal replacement therapy to treat post-surgical or post-radiation hypothyroidism. C-cells in medullary carcinoma do not express TSH receptor, thus, TSH suppression would not be indicated. However, replacement hormonal therapy with synthetic or natural thyroid hormones post surgery is given to treat the post-surgical hypothyroidism. In operable thyroid anaplastic carcinoma, the goal of levothyroxine therapy is hormone replacement. The Thyroid Coding Guidelines are being updated to include oncocytic thyroid cancer in the 2027 release of the SEER Manual. |
Thyroid | Hormone Therapy | 2026 | |
|
|
20260019 | Immunotherapy--Heme & Lymphoid Neoplasms: Should Anti-Thymocyte Globulin (ATG)/Cyclosporine/Prednisone be coded for myelodysplastic dysplastic syndrome (MDS) and if so, how should it be coded? See Discussion. |
Patient failed treatment with Azacitidine for MDS with multilineage dysplasia (9985/3) diagnosed 1/2024, and on re-biopsy of bone marrow 11/2025, histology is now MDS with excess blasts (9989/3). These diagnoses are the same primary using the Hematopoietic and Lymphoid Neoplasms (Heme) Database. The physician has prescribed treatment of Anti-Thymocyte Globulin (ATG)/Cyclosporine/Prednisone. SEER*Rx Database says not to code as ATG and Cyclosporine are antirejection medications post-transplant, but the oncologist is using this combination for treatment. |
Code ATG/Cyclosporine as biological response modifier (BRM)/Immunotherapy as first course of treatment using the current Heme Manual. Based on changes to the 2026 Heme rules for coding treatment, heme and lymphoid neoplasms are now treated differently than Solid Tumors when it comes to treatment failure. It can be used for treatment of selected MDS cases particularly those with low-risk disease, HLA-DR15 histocompatibility type, bone marrow hypoplasia. Prednisone should not be coded as it is not disease modifying agent in MDS. It is usually given to reduce/treat infusion reactions/serum sickness associated with ATG infusion. We will update SEER*Rx. |
Heme & Lymphoid Neoplasms | Immunotherapy | 2026 |
Home
