Note: Links to NAACCR Narrative require the use of DropBox.

  1. Edwards BK, Johnson CH, Adamo M, Peace S, Fritz A, Percy-Laurry AL. Histology Coding and Multiple Primary Rules. NAACCR Narrative, Winter 2005 EditionExternal Web Site Policy, pg 12.
  2. Ehrenkranz R, Lam C, Petkov V, Dilts D, Cheng S, Solis A, Negoita S. Quality Assessment of Tumor Size Data Collection for Pancreatic and Breast Cancer in SEER. Journal of Registry ManagementExternal Web Site Policy (PDF); 45(4):161.
  3. Forjaz G, Barnholtz-Sloan JS, Kruchko C, Siegel R, Negoita S, Ostrom QT, Dickie L, Ruhl J, Van Dyke A, Patil N, Cioffi G, Miller KD, Waite K, Mariotto AB. An updated histology recode for the analysis of primary malignant and nonmalignant brain and other central nervous system tumors in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program. Neurooncol Adv. 2020 Dec 8;3(1):vdaa175.
  4. Fritz A. The SEER Program's Commitment to Data Quality. Journal of Registry Management; 28(1):35.
  5. Gimotty PA, Shore R, Lozon NL, Whitlock J, He S, Vigneau FD, Dickie L, Elder DE, Xu X, Schwartz AG, Guerry D. Miscoding of Melanoma Thickness in SEER: Research and Clinical Implications. J Invest Dermatol. 2016 Nov;136(11):2168-2172.
  6. Hwang L, Altekruse S, Adamo M, Sun L. SEER and NAACCR Data Completeness Methods: How Do They Impact Data Quality in Central Cancer Registries? Journal of Registry Management; 39(4):185.
  7. Johnson CH, Adamo M, Peace S, Fritz A, Percy-Laurry AL, Edwards BK. The MPH Coding Rules Project. NAACCR Narrative, Summer 2005 EditionExternal Web Site Policy, 14-15.
  8. Lam C, Dickie L, Adamo P, Penberthy L. A Plan to Improve Melanoma Tumor Depth Data Quality in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program. Journal of Registry ManagementExternal Web Site Policy (PDF); 43(2):93.
  9. National Cancer Institute Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Prostate-Specific Antigen Working Group; Adamo MP, Boten JA, Coyle LM, Cronin KA, Lam CJ, Negoita S, Penberthy L, Stevens JL, Ward KC. Validation of prostate-specific antigen laboratory values recorded in Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registries. Cancer; 123(4):697-703.
  10. Percy-Laurry AL, Johnson CH, Adamo M, Lewis DR, Peace S, Dickie L, Ruhl J. MP/H Coding Rules Implementation: An Overview. NAACCR Narrative, Summer 2007 EditionExternal Web Site Policy, page 9 -10.
  11. Percy-Laurry AL, Johnson CH, Reichman ME, Adamo M, Lewis DR, Peace S. Revising the Multiple Primary and Histology Coding Rules.Journal of Registry Management; 34(3):81-86.
  12. Sanchez P, Adamo M, Lam C, Stevens J, Brest A, Negoita S. Melanoma Tumor Depth Quality Audit: A Nonmatch Analysis. Journal of Registry ManagementExternal Web Site Policy (PDF); 48(4):161-167.
  13. Temkin SM, Kohn EC, Penberthy L, Cronin KA, Rubinsak L, Dickie LA, Minasian L, Noone AM. Hysterectomy-corrected rates of endometrial cancer among women younger than age 50 in the United States. Cancer Causes Control. 2018 May;29(4-5):427-433.